|
Todd:
[ ... ]
> Most of these points are really "six of one, half dozen of the other" -- but
> the thing about -10 == 45 and -20 == 40 really tips the scales in favor of
> [0,100], IMHO... It's one thing to score LEGO sets or movies or record
> albums on a [-100,+100] scale, but to score what people write about a hobby
> that way -- that's just asking for hurt feelings. Yah?
Although I find the [-100,+100] range more intuitive, I
think you are right that [0,+100] is the range to use for
article scoring.
Play well,
Jacob (who never claimed to be ordinary ;-)
------------------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL: http://hugin.ldraw.org/LEGO/ > --
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Article scoring
|
| (...) OK, a couple of more thoughts on the [-100,+100] vs. [0,100] choice... I'm finding it increasingly difficult to defend the position of [-100,+100] due to a number of reasons. One which I don't think came up yet is how a new or casual user (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|