To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 5161
5160  |  5162
Subject: 
Re: Article scoring
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sun, 12 Mar 2000 13:08:56 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
1611 times
  
Todd:

[ ... ]

Most of these points are really "six of one, half dozen of the other" -- but
the thing about -10 == 45 and -20 == 40 really tips the scales in favor of
[0,100], IMHO...  It's one thing to score LEGO sets or movies or record
albums on a [-100,+100] scale, but to score what people write about a hobby
that way -- that's just asking for hurt feelings.  Yah?

Although I find the [-100,+100] range more intuitive, I
think you are right that [0,+100] is the range to use for
article scoring.

Play well,

Jacob (who never claimed to be ordinary ;-)

------------------------------------------------------------
--  E-mail:               sparre@cats.nbi.dk              --
--  Web...:     <URL: http://hugin.ldraw.org/LEGO/ >      --
------------------------------------------------------------



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Article scoring
 
(...) OK, a couple of more thoughts on the [-100,+100] vs. [0,100] choice... I'm finding it increasingly difficult to defend the position of [-100,+100] due to a number of reasons. One which I don't think came up yet is how a new or casual user (...) (24 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  

52 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR