To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 4846
4845  |  4847
Subject: 
Re: Article scoring
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sat, 4 Mar 2000 23:25:05 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
439 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
In lugnet.admin.general, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
But I'm enough of a narcissist that I'd be prone to artificially boost the
score on my own messages.  And I suspect I'm not alone.  (You know who you
are. ;-)  Should voting on articles you've written be allowed?

IMHO, it absolutely should be allowed, yes!  The worst you could artificially
boost the scores on your own messages is relatively tiny anyway -- once a few
other people also have cast votes.

I would also argue that it's not necessarily _artificial_ boosting.  I know
that for me at least, I'd certainly want to mark many of my own articles as 0
(neutral) and even a few as -1 (negative).

BTW, only Members will be able to moderate (cast votes).  Much too difficult
to track things any other way.

--Todd

Besides just having the final vote result (score), it would also be nice to
know how many people have actually voted.

Another very useful feature would be to be able to sort posts in different
ways.  Right now they are just listed in chronological order, and for searches
by 'relevance'.  But it would be quite useful to be able to see posts sorted
according to the number of votes, or the vote result, or even alphabetically
by author, etc.  (Sometimes I'd like to see search results sorted differently,
as well.)

Also, it might be useful to list only the starting articles of threads, and
not all the followups to it.  Would there be an easy way to create a composite
vote for an entire thread based on the individual votes of the articles in it?

--
  David Schilling



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Article scoring
 
(...) IMHO, it absolutely should be allowed, yes! The worst you could artificially boost the scores on your own messages is relatively tiny anyway -- once a few other people also have cast votes. I would also argue that it's not necessarily (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  

52 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR