Subject:
|
Re: Article scoring
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:39:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1594 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Todd Lehman (<Fr6srt.IrF@lugnet.com>) wrote at
03:38:17
> It's one thing to score LEGO sets or movies or record
> albums on a [-100,+100] scale, but to score what people write about a hobby
> that way -- that's just asking for hurt feelings. Yah?
I think this has been at the back of my mind all along. I don't use the
web i/f, so I've mostly avoided commenting.
--
Tony Priestman
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Article scoring
|
| (...) I thought about that too, but I figured that: 1. Most (not necessarily all, but most) people who would get hurt feelings would tend to post indifferent posts. 2. Unless a post is strongly 'bad', people aren't going to give it a negative vote. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Article scoring
|
| (...) OK, a couple of more thoughts on the [-100,+100] vs. [0,100] choice... I'm finding it increasingly difficult to defend the position of [-100,+100] due to a number of reasons. One which I don't think came up yet is how a new or casual user (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
