To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 3262
3261  |  3263
Subject: 
Re: "compartmentalized dorks"??
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 15 Nov 1999 07:46:51 GMT
Reply-To: 
Selçuk <teyyareci> <sgore@superonlineSPAMCAKE.com>
Viewed: 
331 times
  
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:382c5d58.131081710@lugnet.com...

In a recent (and active) thread entitled "This is irritating" in RTL, it's
been suggested that "Lugnet was designed for compartmentalised dorks" and
that "[it's] for the dorks who can't make up [their] own mind whether to
read a posting or not" and that I am "constantly telling people where they
can and can't post a message on the threat of being expelled"...

I personally happen to disagree with these opinions, but am concerned • about
how such an impression could have formed, and whether other people share
that view.

--Todd

Certainly not at this extend. Even I think the existance of both .pun and
.fun is a bit stretch, I think the logic that lying under the current
hierarchical structure is awesome, which makes browsing through a joy.

Selçuk



Message is in Reply To:
  "compartmentalized dorks"??
 
In a recent (and active) thread entitled "This is irritating" in RTL, it's been suggested that "Lugnet was designed for compartmentalised dorks" and that "[it's] for the dorks who can't make up [their] own mind whether to read a posting or not" and (...) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

26 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR