Subject:
|
Re: "compartmentalized dorks"??
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Nov 1999 19:38:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
365 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Andreas Stabno writes:
> As a matter of fact, I'd rather see
> more "compartmentalization" in some groups, specifically marketplace.pieces
> and marketplace.sets.
What are the chances of seeing something like this? Personally, I'd like to
see even *more* than that, with perhaps:
lugnet.marketplace.pieces
lugnet.marketplace.sets
lugnet.marketplace.castle (.space, .town, .technic, .robotics, etc)
with appropriate crossposting encouraged.
There's I think this would enhance the functionality of the marketplace
groups. I know that I, for one, rarely visit them because I'm just not
interested in a lot of themes, etc, and currently it's still pretty much
anarchy. If something was posted in lugnet.marketplace.castle, however, I
would know that I will find a castle set (or elements) in the list when I look
there, even if I have to sift through other Lego to get there.
It could be further broken down to lugnet.marketplace.auction.(pieces, sets,
[theme]), but that seems to be a bit much. Simply saying that auction updates
are only appropriate in lugnet.marketplace.auction, while announcements are
appropriate in any .marketplace group (other than buy-sell-trade) would be
sufficient.
Or is that all too complicated? I can never tell.
eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "compartmentalized dorks"??
|
| (...) As an active Lugnet reader, I must disagree with the irritating thread. LUGNET allows me to read only those messages that I want without wasting time on insignificant irritating threads. Keeping some sort of order in the jungle of messages (...) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
