Subject:
|
Re: "compartmentalized dorks"??
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Nov 1999 03:19:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3806 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message <382c5d58.131081710@lugnet.com>...
>
> In a recent (and active) thread entitled "This is irritating" in RTL, it's
> been suggested that "Lugnet was designed for compartmentalised dorks" and
> that "[it's] for the dorks who can't make up [their] own mind whether to
> read a posting or not" and that I am "constantly telling people where they
> can and can't post a message on the threat of being expelled"...
>
> I personally happen to disagree with these opinions, but am concerned about
> how such an impression could have formed, and whether other people share
> that view.
Never mind the stupid thread, any plans on importing rec.toys.lego and
alt.toys.lego to Lugnet (for the sake of completeness)? Maybe even going a
step beyond and having past messages of the two groups, even beyond what
deja.com has? A genesis of lego newsgroups, all in one place!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: "compartmentalized dorks"??
|
| (...) *That* IMO would be a huge mistake. There's needs to be a public NG like RTL out there for the masses where they can swear, veer way off-topic, and go unchecked. For folks who are willing to abide by some simple rules of order and conduct, (...) (27 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | "compartmentalized dorks"??
|
| In a recent (and active) thread entitled "This is irritating" in RTL, it's been suggested that "Lugnet was designed for compartmentalised dorks" and that "[it's] for the dorks who can't make up [their] own mind whether to read a posting or not" and (...) (27 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
