Subject:
|
Re: "compartmentalized dorks"??
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Nov 1999 18:51:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
315 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> I personally happen to disagree with these opinions, but am concerned about
> how such an impression could have formed, and whether other people share
> [these] view[s:]
> In a recent (and active) thread entitled "This is irritating" in RTL, it's
> been suggested that "Lugnet was designed for compartmentalised dorks"
Huh? I suppose they mean beacause of the hierarchical structure. I'd say no,
because I see a lot of the same names in different groups. Thus, the people
can't be too "compartmentalised".
> and
> that "[it's] for the dorks who can't make up [their] own mind whether to
> read a posting or not"
Quite the opposite, it's for people who do know what they want to read, and
want to know that when they go to a particular group it will be about something
they want to read.
> and that I am "constantly telling people where they
> can and can't post a message on the threat of being expelled"...
I wouldn't say "constantly". I would say "when necessary". Well, except I
don't think I have *ever* seen you threaten to expel someone from Lugnet as a
whole, only restrict posting privileges.
So, to sum up, no, no, and he[ck] no.
eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | "compartmentalized dorks"??
|
| In a recent (and active) thread entitled "This is irritating" in RTL, it's been suggested that "Lugnet was designed for compartmentalised dorks" and that "[it's] for the dorks who can't make up [their] own mind whether to read a posting or not" and (...) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
