| |
> > Richard Noeckel <Shroud_of_kung_fu@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > You jus' totally reiterated my statement because...?
> > I said: "it takes a while to get heard!"
> > U said: "takes a while to get *responded to*."
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Matthew Miller writes:
> Well, do you think "to be heard" is the same as "to get a response"? 'Cause
> it's not. There's often a lot of perfectly good reasons for there to be a
> lag between the two. The "*" for emphasis was meant to highlight the
> distinction between the two phrases.
<Playful-Sarcasm On>
Ohhhhhhh, I see...
What a big difference! ;)
<Playful-Sarcasm Off>
Sorry I didn’t know such clarity was needed!
(Oups, didn’t completely turn Off the sarcasm)
I jus’ assumed that someone would need to hear/read
the post before it could be responded to. And that a
response is the natural course of action once the
information is interpreted/heard.
But I will award you bonus points for using the “*”
for purposes of emphasis. (2-points for you!)
Congratulations,
--==Richard==--
(Don’t take my gesturing as snide, I'm jus’ jovial right now)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
53 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
