To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Search Results: suggest
 Results 241 – 260 of 403.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Suggest clarification or FAQ entry or new group for BrickShelf discussion
 
see this thread: (URL) is right, it's not at all clear what the right group to FUT to is for BrickShelf(tm) related stuff. A lot of the time it seems to fit into lugnet.publish... is that always the right group? lugnet.admin.brickshelf while (...) (22 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

suggest
(score: 0.769)

  Re: Suggest clarification or FAQ entry or new group for BrickShelf discussion
 
(...) I think a discussion area for features and how to use it would be helpfull on BrickShelf, but there's always an advantage of another place to post, especially those "Hey, can you get to BrickShelf today?" questions. Frank (22 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

suggest
(score: 0.768)

  Re: Posting Dates
 
(...) ?? Wouldn't it show up in their mail on the day it actually got posted rather than the day it was sent, queued up and was intended to be posted? A mail interface person who didn't closely check the date on the mail, or a newsreader person (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

suggest
(score: 0.768)

  Meta discussion about guidance
 
(...) Rather than my usual intersperse, I'll just provide my current thoughts on the subject. I sort of disagree that there is no difference between guidance and discussion of guidance. Basically I think there's a point at where things have veered (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

suggest
(score: 0.768)

  Charter Change for lugnet.db.inv
 
I suggest that the charter for lugnet.db.inv be changed. Currently the charter says lugnet.db.inv- Special data-oriented group for the storage and retrieval of parts inventories of LEGO sets (one set per post); duplication of effort (multiple (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)  
 

suggest
(score: 0.767)

  Suggest a group ...
 
(...) Snipped the rest and FUT to admin.suggestions. More on the actual issue later. I would like to suggest that a group (groups?) be created for focused discussion of parts files so that cad.dat.parts can return to being a group that has dat files (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

suggest
(score: 0.766)

  Re: Allow posting & FUT to member email
 
(...) I would suggest keeping the screen the same, but if the user clicks "Reply" it would take you to a new page that explains "The author of this message has set Followup-To: to 'poster', indicating that he or she wishes any replies to be sent via (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

suggest
(score: 0.766)

  Re: Mail posting (was Re: Unable to connect via NNTP)
 
Dan Boger wrote in message ... (...) your (...) This was when I tried to send back the email confirmation notice. The mail did eventually go through and the posting appeared (tto late to do any good by that time). (...) suggest (...) It's not a (...) (22 years ago, 2-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

suggest
(score: 0.765)

  Re: Suggest a group ...
 
(...) Meow! Other possible names: lugnet.cad.dev.parts lugnet.cad.dev.ldraw.org.parts (ouch! too long!) lugnet.cad.org.ldraw.parts (this one implies a reorg of other .cad group(s)) lugnet.cad.ldraw.parts (reasonable, but too far from existing names) (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

suggest
(score: 0.765)

  Re: Mail posting (was Re: Unable to connect via NNTP)
 
(...) [snip] (...) correct me if I'm wrong, but you're trying to send a message via mail, not via nntp, right? from what you posted it seems like your mail server was not able to look up the correct DNS entry for LUGNET (Failed MX lookup; try again (...) (22 years ago, 2-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

suggest
(score: 0.765)

  Annual Membership Renewal.
 
While the idea of a $10 lifetime membership sounds nice with the caveat that members should add to their membership contribution as they feel LUGNET adds value to their experiance, this is not practical. If you want a consistant flow of cash you (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.finance)
 

suggest
(score: 0.765)

  Re: Ideas ready to be shot down
 
(...) Banner ads are fine with me. I've been meaning to buy some over on Brickshelf for my store, but haven't gotten around to making an actual banner yet! If you go this route, I'd suggest doing it yourself or getting someone a little less (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.finance)
 

suggest
(score: 0.765)

  Some previous suggestions.
 
Since Suz responded that trying to collect previous suggestions might be helpful, I have started trolling through the various admin groups, trying to find items that were previously suggested. My methodology is imperfect, I started by running this (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

suggest
(score: 0.765)

  Re: Ideas ready to be shot down
 
(...) Larry, The thread you posted in was created by me to help the LUGNET community in a small way. Until your post I was very happy with the way it had grown. I count that you have now attacked me personally three times in three days on LUGNET. (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.finance)
 

suggest
(score: 0.765)

  Re: Suggestions to make .market better
 
(...) (Dan answered this one) (...) A FAQ is a good idea and exists already. Whether it can or should give advice about proper behaviour is an open question, but in and of itself doesn't ENSURE that this doesn't happen. That takes guidance, and in (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.curators)
 

suggest
(score: 0.765)

  Re: Allow posting & FUT to member email
 
(...) Well arguably it's not solved. No more or less than the problem of 2 termites in your house would be solved by blowing the entire house up, anyway. (it's late, forgive my poor analogy, but the idea is that the fix isn't a fix if it's worse (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

suggest
(score: 0.765)

  Re: change password & lost password
 
(...) Note that when I wrote that, I didn't know you *could* change the password on LUGNET. I had previously searched for a "change password" link without success. But the URL is only good for a limited time; if you want to have it send a password (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

suggest
(score: 0.764)

  Re: Curating loc.uk
 
(...) Ah, I hope I haven't stepped off on the wrong foot but I did check the page and read the whole of admin.curators and found no reference to us having one. My suggested way forward is that I give loc.uk readers a week to put forward their (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.curators)
 

suggest
(score: 0.764)

  Re: Marketplace / BrickShops was:[Charter Change for market.buy-sell-trade]
 
(...) I think 6 months is a bit extreme, especially to start with. I would suggest 1 month as a minimum, but you can buy longer time periods for a slightly better price. Perhaps a listing fee plus a monthly fee, so that a multi-month ad ends up (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.finance)
 

suggest
(score: 0.764)

  Re: Sale at The Vault this week!
 
(...) S@H specials would also not belong in .shopping if it is for places with a retail outlet. What is the difference between The Vault and S@H? (...) There may need to be a place to discuss issues with BrickLink and general discussion of brick (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 

suggest
(score: 0.764)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR