Subject:
|
Re: Suggest clarification or FAQ entry or new group for BrickShelf discussion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:14:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1200 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> see this thread:
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=36446
>
> Eric is right, it's not at all clear what the right group to FUT to is for
> BrickShelf(tm) related stuff. A lot of the time it seems to fit into
> lugnet.publish... is that always the right group?
>
> lugnet.admin.brickshelf while carrying the desired "ask questions of the
> brickshelf admin" connotation also has the big problem of implying that
> (because it's in the admin hierarchy) that BrickShelf is somehow connected
> to Lugnet(tm), which of course it is not. BrickShelf is an inextricable part
> of the life of most of us though and it's natural to want a place to discuss
> stuff related to it... unlike BrickLink(tm), there's no discussion group to
> use on it, itself. (nor should there be, no doubt)
I think a discussion area for features and how to use it would be
helpfull on BrickShelf, but there's always an advantage of another place
to post, especially those "Hey, can you get to BrickShelf today?"
questions.
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
2 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
