Subject:
|
Suggest clarification or FAQ entry or new group for BrickShelf discussion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Apr 2002 04:01:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
701 times
|
| |
|
|
see this thread:
http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=36446
Eric is right, it's not at all clear what the right group to FUT to is for
BrickShelf(tm) related stuff. A lot of the time it seems to fit into
lugnet.publish... is that always the right group?
lugnet.admin.brickshelf while carrying the desired "ask questions of the
brickshelf admin" connotation also has the big problem of implying that
(because it's in the admin hierarchy) that BrickShelf is somehow connected
to Lugnet(tm), which of course it is not. BrickShelf is an inextricable part
of the life of most of us though and it's natural to want a place to discuss
stuff related to it... unlike BrickLink(tm), there's no discussion group to
use on it, itself. (nor should there be, no doubt)
There is always the option of sending Kevin mail. But that means no one else
benefits from the answers to the questions.
This isn't the most well formed suggestion. In fact maybe there's no problem
at all to suggest a remedy for, but I wanted to capture the issue. It has
come up before.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
2 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
