| |
In lugnet.robotics, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> I noted this article on Slashdot:
> http://slashdot.org/articles/05/11/28/0443232.shtml?tid=159&tid=1
The usual slashdot blend of insightful and not quite as insightful. The
recurring theme that "once you have sold a user a certain amount, they never
need more product, so that's why LEGO went with licenses" is not one that I
agree with, and I suspect I am not alone, many of us like to build big things.
But we're a niche.
This link makes for interesting reading. http://www.techuser.net/lego.html
Something doesn't gibe but I can't say quite what.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot
|
| (...) Slashdot fares better when they stick to technical issues. When the topic drifts to the right way to run a profitable corporation, there is a lot of authority, but little reality. (...) Agreed. It is always amusing when someone attempts to (...) (18 years ago, 28-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot
|
| (...) It's a very funny story. I really tried to read the whole thing, but I can't. I've spent too much time laughing. I recognize the author's logic trail from the cartoon network. IE: "That guy smokes, and those people were killed in a fire, so (...) (18 years ago, 28-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
Message is in Reply To:
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
