Subject:
|
Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 13:04:50 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Matthew Davidson <matthew@blank.org=stopspam=>
|
Viewed:
|
2146 times
|
| |
|
|
On Nov 28, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> The usual slashdot blend of insightful and not quite as insightful.
Slashdot fares better when they stick to technical issues. When the
topic drifts to the right way to run a profitable corporation, there
is a lot of authority, but little reality.
> This link makes for interesting reading. http://www.techuser.net/
> lego.html
> Something doesn't gibe but I can't say quite what.
Agreed. It is always amusing when someone attempts to reduce the cost
of a product by analyzing the cost of the component parts.
The closest look I have to the inside of Lego is the annual report.
The problems they're encountering might be impossible to overcome.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot
|
| (...) recurring theme that "once you have sold a user a certain amount, they never need more product, so that's why LEGO went with licenses" is not one that I agree with, and I suspect I am not alone, many of us like to build big things. But we're a (...) (18 years ago, 28-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
