To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 4859
4858  |  4860
Subject: 
Re: Tanks or Power Armor
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space
Date: 
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:31:19 GMT
Viewed: 
2777 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Niels Bugge wrote:
   I agree on the fact that, no groundforces are immune to mines, but regarding treaties, they only survive as long as politicians back them up and with regarding the mines, sorry, the bad guys still have them and won’t sign any treaty so they’re here to stay

Well, the nations that are most likely to be able to develop hover tanks are also the nations that are most likely to be able to develop anti-HT mines. Generally, they’re also the same countries that will sign arms reduction treaties. Granted, it’s a little easier to be “gracious” about giving up weapons technologies when you’ve got one of the dozen or so most powerful militaries, or when you’re a few decades behind the technology curve. But yeah, treaties are only as valuable as the signees hold them to be.

   The Americans is already able to perform that kind of attack, calling it something like over the horizont...

Modern tanks being unable to swim, however, means that you need to send them in on special landing craft. The advantage you’d get with hover tanks is that they’d be able to perform their own “landing” without need for additional specialized vessels.

   As I wrote to Larry, you can’t expect to have air superiorty, so the tanks can end up pretty much on their own (just think of the Iraqi tanks), speed will be the essence, not armour.

As long as you’re fighting people who have weapons, the armor is always important. Speed only completely supercedes it if you can guarantee that you can outrun or dodge all enemy fire, and if they end up being used in defensive actions, that’s pretty much ruled out.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Tanks or Power Armor
 
(...) As far as "the dozen or so most powerful militaries" today, it is them that have all (or most of) the ABC-weapons and mines, and the only treaties I'm awere of has been ones designed to prevent others from getting them, or scrapping outdated (...) (20 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Tanks or Power Armor
 
(...) I agree on the fact that, no groundforces are immune to mines, but regarding treaties, they only survive as long as politicians back them up and with regarding the mines, sorry, the bad guys still have them and won’t sign any treaty so they're (...) (20 years ago, 30-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, FTX)

50 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR