Subject:
|
Re: This is incredible!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 May 2000 14:37:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1718 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> Whatever the law says on this thing - TLC/G were wrong not to credit Todd…
> just imagine if it was the Coca Cola Logo!
Agreed! I was wondering, though; does the Mania magazine have anything like
a general Trademark disclaimer? I've read other magazines that say something
like "individual trademarks are held by their respective owners, and their
mention here should not be construed as a challenge to their status."
My question is more for my own curiosity than for the situation at hand--I
agree absolutely that appropriate credit should have been given.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: This is incredible!
|
| (...) I haven't seen one, but I don't think anyone would have recognized as needing a trademark or I don't think it would have appeared at all. I'm pretty sure most people at Lego didn't make the connection at all or even know our existence. I think (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: This is incredible!
|
| (...) in (...) This is a good point. These days, within society as a whole, people are too concerned about staying within the law (often just within the law). I think one can be inside the law - but still be morally wrong. If "thinking people", as (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
