Subject:
|
Re: Bionicle going away?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Jun 2001 01:28:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1674 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, David Arnon writes:
> Actually I was quite happy with the droids and I was happy to call them a
> 'Technic set' I think their main feature was their functions.
Please, oh please, tell me that the Technic Pit Droid is an exception.
> That's a good point. If you feel that way then I guess you'd consider the
> Bionicle line 'Technic' also in the meaning I'm talking about. I don't.
> As I said - it's subjective.
Which, of course, is why this whole argument is completely pointless and
everyone who posted in this thread is insane (especially me). Not that
there's anything wrong with pointlessness or insanity, but I thought I'd
just point that out.
-Andrusi &&
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
| (...) Oh yeah, thank you for reminding me! I actually don't have the pit droid, so I really can't comment on it, but it does seem simpler. (...) I'll add my name under the 'insane' category, thank you for pointing out the pointlessness... :-) - (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
| (...) I think it's obvious that it's a 'Model Team' set by nature. I have only 3 Model Team sets but I got the impression that all of them contain at least some Technic elements and have some functions. What differentiates this line from the Technic (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
