Subject:
|
Re: Where's all that gravity coming from?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Mar 2001 17:07:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
587 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Damraska wrote:
> J.D. Forinash <foxtrot@cc.gatech.edu> wrote in message
> news:986560$3pl$1@y2.bufordnet.foo...
> > I think I'm really glad I just stick 4x4x2 rocket cones on the back and
> > use studs for gravity.
>
> I personally lean towards the 3x3x2 rocket cones these days. They seem more
> sleek to me.
It's that higher-technology, doing more work with less mass.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Where's all that gravity coming from?
|
| J.D. Forinash <foxtrot@cc.gatech.edu> wrote in message news:986560$3pl$1@y2...net.foo... (...) for (...) the (...) I considered and discarded that methodology, but upon reflection, I cannot think of a good reason why. It could work. The probability (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.space)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
