Subject:
|
Re: .space Subtheme Guide
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Apr 2004 22:09:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1440 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.space, Paul Baulch wrote:
|
In lugnet.space, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
|
Hehehe, I knew it would happen. The office of the Jr. Marshall has already
expressed his opinions. I think I will change it to an alphebetical system.
|
Hi Kevin, what you might want to consider is categorisation by role...
after all, a subtheme/faction is typically designed with a particular role
(or at least a primary role) in mind.
- Military
- Police
- Emergency services
- Exploration
- Other commercial (Space paparazzi, space transport) this could be split as necessary
- Pirates/mercenaries/bounty-hunters
- Evildoers (what do they do specifically, anyway???)
- Miscellaneous recreational (RastaSTARians, Space hippies)
- General social structures (Sea Monkeys, Iron Reich)
Im sure it will still be difficult to categorise some subthemes, but I think
itd work better than by moral alignment. This way you could also allow a
subtheme to exist in more than one category, e.g. PCS could be both military
and exploration.
Anywa, I just look forward to some arrangement that groups them together in a
useful way, as opposed to a single humungous list...
|
These are some good ideas. I dont think there are enough subthemes to justify
such a detailed organization system at the moment, but I will keep this idea in
mind for the future.
Thanks for the input!
~Kevin Blocksidge
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: .space Subtheme Guide
|
| (...) Hi Kevin, what you might want to consider is categorisation by role... after all, a subtheme/faction is typically designed with a particular role (or at least a primary role) in mind. Military Police Emergency services Exploration Other (...) (21 years ago, 2-Apr-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|