Subject:
|
Re: Space Cargo Container Standard?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:02:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
778 times
|
| |
|
|
I'm wondering if no one saw my last post under the old thread
http://news.lugnet.com/space/?n=32271
but I've done exactly this and it works great.
I'll post some LDRAW files when I get home tonight : )
Jeff Findley wrote:
> Even though I rarely start threads on Lugnet, I thought this topic is ripe for
> discussion.
>
> We've seen from the recent thread, http://news.lugnet.com/space/?n=32226
> Trainhead gives space a whirl, that there seems to be some interest in a Space
> Cargo Container Standard.
>
> Drawing on the above thread, I'd guess that you'd want both ends of the cargo
> container to conform to the existing standard for a Moonbase Corridor connection
> (i.e. 8 studs wide with the 2 1x2 bricks with hole in the proper place).
> Furthermore, it seems that 8 studs wide works for trains.
>
> I'm not sure about the height. The ends of the Moonbase Corridor are 7 bricks
> and two plates high. It might be nice to extend this a bit both up and down so
> that a standard can be made for the top and bottom that will allow stacking of
> containers. Perhaps there is a technique to be borrowed from Trains?
>
> As for the length, Moonbase Modules are 48x48 studs. If you choose to make them
> 16 studs long, three containers in length is exactly the length of a Moonbase
> Module. This allows containers to be used as expansion modules on a moonbase.
> It's also exactly twice the standard width of the Moonbase Corridor, which will
> make the containers the same width vs. length ratio as the classic 2x4 brick.
> What do others think about a standard length?
>
>
> Comments, suggestions, flames?
>
> Jeff
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: Space Cargo Container Standard?
|
| (...) I really like your cargo modules and would love to see this extended into a "real" standard, published on the Moonbase website. This is very close to what I'd envision as a standard. I really like the ability to put Moonbase connections on the (...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-04, to lugnet.space)
| | | Re: Space Cargo Container Standard?
|
| (...) More pics of cargo space and rail elements : ) The modular cab & thruster assemblies rendevous with long-range hyperspace haulers in orbit above the moonbase and bring TEU's down to the surface. (URL) the surface, the TEU's are transferred to (...) (21 years ago, 29-Mar-04, to lugnet.space)
| | | Re: Space Cargo Container Standard?
|
| (...) Looks like a moonbase trailer park... :-) Actually, that's not a bad idea either. Why pack your belongings when you move? Just uncouple the module and transport the whole works. -Duane (21 years ago, 29-Mar-04, to lugnet.space)
| | | ContainerHabs
|
| (...) Neat ideas! A stack of ContainerHab floors lends itself nicely to several high-density temporary housing uses: * Low income single person housing * Construction worker/military barracks * cargo runner motel (think truck stop) * prison cell (...) (21 years ago, 30-Mar-04, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Space Cargo Container Standard?
|
| Even though I rarely start threads on Lugnet, I thought this topic is ripe for discussion. We've seen from the recent thread, (URL) gives space a whirl, that there seems to be some interest in a Space Cargo Container Standard. Drawing on the above (...) (21 years ago, 25-Mar-04, to lugnet.space)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
