To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqcOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / NQC / 1599
1598  |  1600
Subject: 
RE: NQC's future
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth
Date: 
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:45:40 GMT
Reply-To: 
<(rhempel@)nomorespam(bmts.com)>
Viewed: 
13471 times
  
Something I'd like to see implemented in NQC is a mixed-mode multiply/divide,
similar to the */ operator in Forth, with an intermediary 32bits product. That
would greatly ease precision calculations without requiring major structural
modifications.

Ha Ha, very funny :-)

Seriously, Philippe, why not give pbForth a try? I know that NQC works great
on both the Spybots and the RCX, and even Cybermaster.

But if you're looking for speed, higher precision, lots of variables
and generally more horsepower without the BrickOS complexity....

I've just added basic DCC to the kernel and separated pbForth into
three flavours, basic, servo enabled, and DCC enabled.

I'm adding more and more tutorials as we move along, and I'm still actively
developing pbForth - recent RCX rumors notwithstanding.

Cheers, Ralph

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out pbFORTH for LEGO Mindstorms at:
<http://www.hempeldesigngroup.com/lego/pbForth>

Buy "Extreme Mindstorms: an Advanced Guide to Lego Mindstorms"
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1893115844/hempeldesigngrou>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to:      rhempel at bmts dot com
--------------------------------------------------------------------



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: NQC's future
 
(...) ;o) ... but why not ? (...) You're right, I should try pbForth, actually I intend to do that for a while but never jumped in. In the late 80's, I was involved in a point of sales terminal project that was programmed with a preemptive (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: NQC's future
 
(...) Something I'd like to see implemented in NQC is a mixed-mode multiply/divide, similar to the */ operator in Forth, with an intermediary 32bits product. That would greatly ease precision calculations without requiring major structural (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)

29 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR