To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqcOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / NQC / 1607
1606  |  1608
Subject: 
Re: NQC's future
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics
Date: 
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:22:47 GMT
Viewed: 
11941 times
  
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, Brian Davis wrote:
John Hansen wrote:

I'm very interested in hearing from NQC users what their
needs/wishes are for future enhancements.

   Here's a suggestion/question: is it possible (either in the current
incarnation or a future one) for NQC to use FastTimer() as a source for events?
Timer() works, but not (it seems) FastTimer().

According to the LEGO documentation, only the normal (source 1) Timers can be
used as an event source.

The ‘sensors’ for which events can be generated are:
·  Physical sensors (Source 9, Range 0-2, Logical number 0-2)
·  System timers (Source 1, Range 0-3, Logical number 3-6)
·  IR Message (Source 15, Range 0, Logical number 7)
·  Counters (Source 0/21, Range 0-2, Logical number 8-10)

So I don't think I'll be able to add support for FastTimer as an event source.

John Hansen



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: NQC's future
 
(...) Here's a suggestion/question: is it possible (either in the current incarnation or a future one) for NQC to use FastTimer() as a source for events? Timer() works, but not (it seems) FastTimer(). (21 years ago, 11-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)

29 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR