| |
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, Mark Riley wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, John Hansen wrote:
>
> John, thanks for taking on the maintenance and improvement of NQC.
I am happy to help out as best I can. Unfortunately, there is little chance
that I will do as good a job as Dave Baum has done over the years. But I'll try
my best.
> > Sometime in the next few months I hope to explore adding support for the Spybot
> > stack with subroutine parameters and calling other subroutines from within a
> > subroutine.
>
> I'd definitely like to see this one implemented, when you can find the time. :-)
Yes. When I can find the time. I'm also trying to find the time to do a few
cool things with BricxCC and support for the Spybot EEPROM as well.
I also wanted to ask folks whether they use the asm statement much, if at all,
in their own programs. The '&' is already used in the asm statement with a
somewhat different meaning, so I have been considering changing the asm
statement to use some other character so that I can more easily use '&' in such
expressions as '&x' to mean "take the address of x":
void Foo(int* a)
{
*a = 10;
}
task main()
{
int x = 5;
int* y = &x;
*y = 4; // x = 4
Foo(y);
}
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
