Subject:
|
RE: Ideas for NQC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:13:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6917 times
|
| |
|
|
>
> I object to this proposed change. Lack of knowledge of a
> language's syntax does not justify changing the syntax.
I could not agree more with Kevin. Adding a feature, such as adding in more
intricate math functions, or add in tcp/ip socket support, etc. is more
fruitful than making the language syntax more like others just because
someone is not used to it... What if someone who is used to COBOL comes
along and ask if the syntax can look more like COBOL. This will really just
make the language more convoluted... Let alone the compilation may very well
be longer because the parser has to understand all different grammar ...
My 2cents
--
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Ideas for NQC
|
| (...) I object to this proposed change. Lack of knowledge of a language's syntax does not justify changing the syntax. (...) [SNIP] Kevin (20 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
