 | | Re: I played with fire...
|
|
Well, Philo did it again, Hourrah for him... I bypassed the fuse and the RCX came back to life. Now, will I be carefull enough with my RCX without a fuse or should I replace it ? (17 years ago, 2-Sep-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
"daniel" <daniel.formatc.at.gmail.com> wrote in message news:Jnp0Cy.2CJ@lugnet.com... (...) This X axis gear box is loaded so there is no backlash. The 16T gear on the right side has a hole through it and is fixed to the shaft with a serrated half (...) (17 years ago, 1-Sep-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
(...) 16t gear to the gear rack on the bottom of the table. also, the z axis seems to use an idler gear. that's exactly the setup i've built, you can see it here: (URL) top left, next to the tool changer idea (right next to the tiny word "tool"). i (...) (17 years ago, 1-Sep-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
"daniel" <daniel.formatc.at.gmail.com> wrote in message news:JnMwFu.CMs@lugnet.com... (...) I like the worm for a drive. It provides the best ratio and the least backlash. It also acts as a brake while the slide is under the pressure returned by (...) (17 years ago, 31-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
ok, now i understand what you mean. the problem is that this setup could be difficult for long axes, i guess the axle with the worm gears would flex too much... (...) exactly what i was thinking. that's the way the machines i've seen change their (...) (17 years ago, 31-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
"daniel" <daniel.formatc.at.gmail.com> wrote in message news:JnL3ox.7r9@lugnet.com... (...) As you can see, I do not know how to get "deep links" on Brick Shelf. If I figure it out I will post the links again. The tools can ride a disk in front of (...) (17 years ago, 30-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
"daniel" <daniel.formatc.at.gmail.com> wrote in message news:JnL3ox.7r9@lugnet.com... (...) (URL) Hope I did this right. Bob (17 years ago, 30-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
(...) indeed, i agree! (...) i can't quite picture what you mean. could you upload a drawing or something? the animation you sent is good, actually the up/down movement it makes could be the z-axis itself, saving me another motor (not the tool (...) (17 years ago, 30-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
"Bob Fay" <rgfay@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:JnKABC.F5v@lugnet.com... (...) I was successful reaching your page. It answers my questions about configuration. I am sure you will agree with me that Lego should have made a rack gear that (...) (17 years ago, 30-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
"daniel" <daniel.formatc.at.gmail.com> wrote in message news:JnJLtv.G5y@lugnet.com... (...) That should be possible. I am thinking of parafin (sp?). That is a lot different. Worth a try. (...) Not able to recycle. Might even cause global warming. (...) (17 years ago, 30-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
(...) heh i guess i'll go get a candle tomorrow to test this. but that certainly is bad news. but on the other hand, there are harder and softer variants of wax? (or so i've heard) (...) cool thought. but this will make a huge mess... and it's not (...) (17 years ago, 29-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
"daniel" <daniel.formatc.at.gmail.com> wrote in message news:JnJ1C5.KxF@lugnet.com... (...) Keep in mind that vibration is a major problem when you actually attempt to cut any material. Also, the cutter wants to be drawn into the material as the (...) (17 years ago, 29-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
(...) yes, i haven't quite figured out how to make the tools exchangeable, especialy by a machine. (manually wouldn't be a problem) one possibility would be to slowly turn the spindle while the tool is being inserted so it finds the axlehole more (...) (17 years ago, 29-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
"daniel" <daniel.formatc.at.gmail.com> wrote in message news:JnI1G4.GAx@lugnet.com... (...) Tool changers are usually very troublesome on a real machine. You will have to do some fancy engineering to get the proper tool that your material will (...) (17 years ago, 29-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: I played with fire...
|
|
(...) Here is the backside : (URL) (17 years ago, 28-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
wooooow you're the guy that built all those milling machines? and the lathe? first of all, respect! i loved the toast milling :D of course i checked out your site, it's pretty inspiring but i'm thinking of making some additions to the machine (...) (17 years ago, 28-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
"daniel" <daniel.formatc.at.gmail.com> wrote in message news:JnHosE.AJ6@lugnet.com... (...) Looks like your plan will provide a complete package. You are welcome to any ideas on my site. This is a real challenge. Bob Fay (17 years ago, 28-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
|
hey! first post on lugnet, i hope it won't be the last! anyways, i just wanted to share my new creation with you, the LEGO CNC-MACHINE. to avoid confusions, this is not a finished project, i'm starting to build it and will keep posting updates on my (...) (17 years ago, 28-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | New RCX 2.0 version
|
|
The photo posted by Patrick Bégin ((URL) a new version of the RCX 2.0 board, with several interesting characteristics... - The board was completely redesigned, here is the photo of the new version posted by Patrick: (URL) older version looked like (...) (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: I played with fire...
|
|
(...) Hello Patrick, Your RCX2 version is completely new to me - That't very interesting... more on that later (btw, would you have a photo of the other side of the board?). The component you show as burnt is most probably a power diode, as (...) (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: I played with fire...
|
|
(...) My mistake. The RCX 1.0 has an AC adaptor jack which has a full-wave bridge rectifier to convert to DC and would provide AC protection. I guess RCX 2.0, without the external jack, does not have this. (17 years ago, 26-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: I played with fire...
|
|
(...) I applied 9V AC power to the internal + - battery connectors. (17 years ago, 26-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: I played with fire...
|
|
(...) While your RCX is fried, it is probably not from plugging AC power into the power plug. LEGO's low voltage adaptor is an AC adaptor. Or did you mean you applied AC power to the RCX sensor port? (17 years ago, 26-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: I played with fire...
|
|
Hi Patrick, (...) that looks like a somewhat large diode to me. In my own picture it is round and is marked with a diode symbol and "A2". (...) It shouldn't he hard to replace. But I doubt that it is the only thing that is damaged. It looks like it (...) (17 years ago, 26-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | I played with fire...
|
|
I applied 9V AC power to a RCX 2.0... yes yes, DC is required. Does anybody successfully repaired such a disaster ? Here are pictures pointing to what I think burned out. What is that component ? Anybody successfully replaced it ? (URL) have (...) (17 years ago, 24-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible bug? Simple light sensor condition checking.
|
|
(...) It looks to me like the c compiler optimized the assignment to the variable away, since there is no external method call (shutdown_requested() is just a macro). (...) You should make this volatile int offonpad = 0; (...) You should also put an (...) (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible bug? Simple light sensor condition checking.
|
|
I use BrickOS (LegOS) but I'm not expert in the inner workings. The code you have here appears fine to me. So, it may be a bug in BrickOS, or a problem elsewhere in your code. I will say I've ran into some interesting things when using tasks. (...) (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Possible bug? Simple light sensor condition checking.
|
|
I tried my own skill on writing a program for the included lego test pad (RIS 2.0), and I discovered something weird. The following code does set the conditions right, but the following code doesn't set the conditions right if I comment out the (...) (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Sign of center pin on power adaptor
|
|
(...) You must be dealing with a different release of the battery pack than I am, since the only portion of the US instructions that mentions numbers states the output of the battery pack (10VAC, 7VA) and the approximate charge time (4 hours). There (...) (17 years ago, 12-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with the RCX
|
|
"Brian Davis" <brdavis@iusb.edu> wrote in message news:JL1oK5.K84@lugnet.com... (...) This might help! (URL) (...) (17 years ago, 12-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with the RCX
|
|
(...) Is the RCX still working? Does it "get hot" when it's running an unloaded motor? I would have thought that the 500 mA limit within the RCX case would prevent this, but perhaps it's marginal for some plastic piece "nearby". If the RCX is dead, (...) (17 years ago, 12-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | problem with the RCX
|
|
One of my students accidently left a tied up gear train running for a while, i.e. In the midst of running a RCX, the case not only gets very hot, but also has a very strong plastic burning smell. At first I thought it is due to the stuck gear train, (...) (17 years ago, 11-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Sign of center pin on power adaptor
|
|
(...) I agree. (...) The spec on the train AC adapter exactly matches the spec in the Li-Ion battery pack instructions. Jürgen (17 years ago, 11-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Sign of center pin on power adaptor
|
|
(...) Whoops, I missed that there was a third option. I concur with this, as it's both the right voltage and confirmed AC. The mA rating, BTW, is a capacity rating, so it will work for anything that draws 800mA or less. The NXT adapter is rated for (...) (17 years ago, 11-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Sign of center pin on power adaptor
|
|
(...) All my train PSUs are 10V AC, but are rectified and regulated to a nice 9V internally. (17 years ago, 11-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Sign of center pin on power adaptor
|
|
Usually AC will either say AC or have a ~ symbol. DC will either say DC or have a symbol that looks like = or _-_ -Rob A> (...) (17 years ago, 10-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Sign of center pin on power adaptor
|
|
(...) The AT&T 9v AC 800mA supply sounds just about right. (17 years ago, 10-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Sign of center pin on power adaptor
|
|
(...) _ALWAYS_ assume DC on an actual power adapter (at least in the US). Most AC devices will just use a simple cord, like you'd find on a portable stereo. A handful of devices will need AC power in a non-standard voltage and will use DC-like power (...) (17 years ago, 10-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Sign of center pin on power adaptor
|
|
(...) The one used for the RCX may be, but the NXT power supply is sold as a different item, and is listed as a 10VAC adapter vs. the 9VAC adapters used by trains and various other systems. Not that it matters unless you also buy the Li-Ion battery (...) (17 years ago, 10-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Sign of center pin on power adaptor
|
|
(...) I now have a Dynamic Instruments 16VAC 375mA, AT&T AC 9V 800mA, and a Black & Decker 9V 200mA from a Dust Buster but it does not say if it is DC or AC, I am assuming AC. Which one should I use? I am hoping the AT&T but the 800mA makes me a (...) (17 years ago, 10-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
