Subject:
|
Re: MDP Status - Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:55:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2785 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> > (2) receive an NDA
> Do we even know that people in the "beta test" will be required to sign
> NDAs? What benifit to LEGO would there be by having people sign NDAs? (much
> better to have everyone spreading the word and getting free word-of-mouth
> advertizing :)
And since one of the areas they're looking for people to contribute is in
blogging, it would truly be counterproductive.
They might have some kind of agreement that allows people to talk but not to
share internals or something like that--but that's just a guess.
Peter
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: MDP Status - Update
|
| (...) There is a very fine line from comprimising your product and restricting your developer program too much to be really useful. Also, with products that contain IP from multiple sources it can even be more hairy. Think about it: there is the (...) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: MDP Status - Update
|
| (...) Do we even know that people in the "beta test" will be required to sign NDAs? What benifit to LEGO would there be by having people sign NDAs? (much better to have everyone spreading the word and getting free word-of-mouth advertizing :) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
