Subject:
|
Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:47:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3258 times
|
| |
 | |
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> On Mon, January 23, 2006 5:37 am, PeterBalch wrote:
> >
> > Kev
> >
> > > My guess is that it is not possible for the official language can be everything
> > > to eveyone.
> >
> > Why not?
> >
> > Why couldn't the original RIS language interface have had a button to press
> > which converted your program to a textual form like a conventional
> > language? And this textual language had all the extra goodies that hackers
> > want?
>
> TLG must provide software (firmware) that's "Bullet-Proof" for kids. (most of their
> users)
>
> I prefer a faster version of the firmware, which is why I use BrickOS.
>
> These appear mutually exclusive. Is that different from what you're talking about?
>
> Steve
One possibility would be to have a compiler that compiles NXT graphical code
into ARM code, or NXT executable into ARM code (kind of like a Java just in time
compiler). This would bypass the interpreter of the firmware and potentially
give you a great performance boost (probably at a cost of space).
Kev
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:  | | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
| (...) What is the output of the NXT graphical programming environment? I mean the NXT could already have a JIT type execution environment already whereby the graphical IDE generates pseudo-code ("bytecode") and the firmware on the NXT does the (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
| (...) TLG must provide software (firmware) that's "Bullet-Proof" for kids. (most of their users) I prefer a faster version of the firmware, which is why I use BrickOS. These appear mutually exclusive. Is that different from what you're talking (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:               
         
       
      ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Steve Hassenplug (25-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -John Hansen (25-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Ross Crawford (25-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
     ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Tim Byrne (26-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
     ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Steve Hassenplug (26-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Claude Baumann (26-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
  
  
      
     
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|