Subject:
|
Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:01:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1912 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> > On Mon, January 23, 2006 5:37 am, PeterBalch wrote:
> > >
> > > Kev
> > >
> > > > My guess is that it is not possible for the official language can be everything
> > > > to eveyone.
> > >
> > > Why not?
> > >
> > > Why couldn't the original RIS language interface have had a button to press
> > > which converted your program to a textual form like a conventional
> > > language? And this textual language had all the extra goodies that hackers
> > > want?
> >
> > TLG must provide software (firmware) that's "Bullet-Proof" for kids. (most of their
> > users)
> >
> > I prefer a faster version of the firmware, which is why I use BrickOS.
> >
> > These appear mutually exclusive. Is that different from what you're talking about?
> >
> > Steve
>
> One possibility would be to have a compiler that compiles NXT graphical code
> into ARM code, or NXT executable into ARM code (kind of like a Java just in time
> compiler). This would bypass the interpreter of the firmware and potentially
> give you a great performance boost (probably at a cost of space).
What is the output of the NXT graphical programming environment? I mean the NXT
could already have a JIT type execution environment already whereby the
graphical IDE generates pseudo-code ("bytecode") and the firmware on the NXT
does the dynamic translation on the fly. I don't know, but the above *seems*
reasonable to me. Moreover, future versions of the NXT compiler within the
graphical IDE would be compatible with any platform changes (new JIT firmware).
Right?
I wonder if the specs for the firmware and/or feature set will be open (i.e.
Lego will publish complete/specs, etc. during its release).
-aps
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
| (...) I don't know the format of the output of the graphical programming environment. The concept of a JIT compiler seems good to me. Dunno where it should exist. on the NXT or on the PC? (...) Could be. (...) I sure hope so. (...) Kev (19 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
| (...) One possibility would be to have a compiler that compiles NXT graphical code into ARM code, or NXT executable into ARM code (kind of like a Java just in time compiler). This would bypass the interpreter of the firmware and potentially give you (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
