To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 25442
25441  |  25443
Subject: 
Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 02:55:48 GMT
Viewed: 
1935 times
  
On Mon, January 23, 2006 9:04 pm, pisymbol wrote:

Maybe this is all crazy, I'm not sure, but it seems with Bluetooth, passing
along the logic via messages to a more powerful host makes a lot of sense to
me... (provided the messages are easy to consume and produce, obviously trying
to parse XML on the tiny NXT may be a bad idea).

This doesn't sound crazy to me.  And, I'd be willing to bet the people at LEGO don't
think it's crazy, either.

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
 
(...) Thanks Steve! I would definitely like to explore this idea if I'm part of the MDP (unless the NXT already has a high-level protocol!). -aps (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
 
(...) Well my understaing of JIT compiler is that its a part of the actual runtime so I'm not sure how it would be on the PC?! Though you got me thinking (dangerous), perhaps the best way to program the NXT is not to run a binary but instead use an (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)

25 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
11 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR