Subject:
|
Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:16:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1673 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.robotics, John Hansen wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> > I think you could ask anyone that uses a computer, and a VERY LARGE percentage
> > will tell you using the graphical environment of Windows or Mac is easier than a
> > text-based language like Linux. Of course some will tell you they don't have an
> > icon for Linux?!? And, yes, a very few will say they prefer the command prompt
> > to a mouse.
>
> Linux isn't a language. It's an operating system. And nobody I know uses Linux
> without a graphical user interface.
Ahem, I'm using debian right now as a server, and haven't even installed a
graphical interface on it. And yes, I regularly have to go delve into config
files etc with vi.
> And nobody I know programs in text-based
> languages at a OS command prompt using VI.
In fact I did exactly that with LegOS (as it was then) and NQC for quite some
time before BricxCC supported them (thanks!). But I'm totally converted now ;)
and hope to remain so when programming the NXT, but if I have to build and use a
cross-compiler and vi on my linux box for a while, I'm totally ok with that.
> I would wager that most (if not 100% of) NQC, brickOS, and leJOS
> users on Linux use a graphical text editor (with windows and a mouse pointer) to
> write their programs.
I haven't installed one of those either! But I can edit files on my windows PC
using gvim or similar if I feel like it. I must admit though, most of my RCX
programming these days is on windows anyway.
I can't believe I'm such a rare beast ;)
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms
|
| (...) Linux isn't a language. It's an operating system. And nobody I know uses Linux without a graphical user interface. And nobody I know programs in text-based languages at a OS command prompt using VI. Do people write posts to Lugnet by dragging (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
25 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (PeterBalch) (23-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -Steve Hassenplug (23-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -Kevin L. Clague (23-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -Alexander Sack (23-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -Kevin L. Clague (23-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -Alexander Sack (24-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -Steve Hassenplug (24-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -Alexander Sack (24-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Mr S) (24-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![NXT + BlueTooth + PC (was: Java Baad) -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (dan miller) (24-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -Alexander Sack (24-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -John Hansen (24-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Steve Hassenplug (25-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -John Hansen (25-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Tim Byrne (26-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Steve Hassenplug (26-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Claude Baumann (26-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -Kevin L. Clague (23-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (dan miller) (23-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (T. Alexander Popiel) (23-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -Steve Lane (23-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -Kevin L. Clague (23-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (T. Alexander Popiel) (24-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -Benton Jackson (24-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|