Subject:
|
Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:54:51 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
T. Alexander Popiel <popiel@SPAMLESSwolfskeep.com>
|
Viewed:
|
2888 times
|
| |
 | |
In message: <ItKJ47.yFK@lugnet.com>
"Steve Lane" writes:
>
> I'd like my NXT to be self aware, straight out of the box. Am I asking
> too much?
> :-)
I don't think you're asking too much. Just be warned that self
aware robots tend to be depressed. Just look at Marvin from
Hitchhiker's. Oh, and C3PO seems to be bipolar. :-P
- Alex
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:               
         
       
      ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Steve Hassenplug (25-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -John Hansen (25-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Ross Crawford (25-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
     ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Tim Byrne (26-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
     ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Steve Hassenplug (26-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Claude Baumann (26-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
  
  
      
     
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|