Subject:
|
Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:46:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1671 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Lane wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, "T. Alexander Popiel" <popiel@wolfskeep.com> wrote:
>
> > When you speak of "a conventional language", are you talking
> > about a procedural one (like C, Java, Basic, etc), a declarative
> > one (like Prolog, Haskell, Erlang, make, etc), a structural one
> > (like the various neural networks or cellular automata), or
> > one of the other myriad paths that have been followed in the last
> > 60 years?
>
> I'd like my NXT to be self aware, straight out of the box. Am I asking too much?
> :-)
Mammals don't even come like that. LOL!
>
> Steve
Kev
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
