Subject:
|
Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 04:41:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3030 times
|
| |
 | |
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> On Mon, January 23, 2006 9:04 pm, pisymbol wrote:
>
> > Maybe this is all crazy, I'm not sure, but it seems with Bluetooth, passing
> > along the logic via messages to a more powerful host makes a lot of sense to
> > me... (provided the messages are easy to consume and produce, obviously trying
> > to parse XML on the tiny NXT may be a bad idea).
>
> This doesn't sound crazy to me. And, I'd be willing to bet the people at LEGO don't
> think it's crazy, either.
Thanks Steve! I would definitely like to explore this idea if I'm part of the
MDP (unless the NXT already has a high-level protocol!).
-aps
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:               
         
       
      ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Steve Hassenplug (25-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -John Hansen (25-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Ross Crawford (25-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
     ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Tim Byrne (26-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
     ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Steve Hassenplug (26-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms -Claude Baumann (26-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
  
  
      
     
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|