To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 3135
3134  |  3136
Subject: 
Re: Project X and game play
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:13:38 GMT
Viewed: 
528 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys writes:

If we are using an x-y system, does the bot have to be 'off the board' when
it starts or when it's done, i.e. no part of the bot is hovering over the
grid before or after the event.

If the robot has to start off the board and end off the board, this ruins my
feeble plan. I do have an idea to compinsate for this, but I'd like to know.

Meanwhile, I'm scared. I'm not having fun learning NQC, and I want to go back to
RCX1.0 where I feel safe.

-Greg Hyland



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Project X and game play
 
(...) I think starting on top of the board is okay. In our robot, parts of the robot overhang the board. I think the only thing I would draw the line at is attaching stuff to the actual board (ie, 2xN pieces) (...) C's a good idea to learn, if (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Project X and game play
 
(...) We could go head to head, 2 'bots at a time. It says right on the rules that anyone using multiple RCX's should build in fault tolerance ;p For those of us who can do it all with 1 RCX, we're not too worried ;) Whatever the group decides... I (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

22 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR