To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 3135
3134  |  3136
Subject: 
Re: Project X and game play
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:13:38 GMT
Viewed: 
1870 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys writes:
> 
> If we are using an x-y system, does the bot have to be 'off the board' when
> it starts or when it's done, i.e. no part of the bot is hovering over the
> grid before or after the event.

If the robot has to start off the board and end off the board, this ruins my
feeble plan. I do have an idea to compinsate for this, but I'd like to know.

Meanwhile, I'm scared. I'm not having fun learning NQC, and I want to go back to
RCX1.0 where I feel safe.

-Greg Hyland



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Project X and game play
 
(...) I think starting on top of the board is okay. In our robot, parts of the robot overhang the board. I think the only thing I would draw the line at is attaching stuff to the actual board (ie, 2xN pieces) (...) C's a good idea to learn, if (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Project X and game play
 
(...) We could go head to head, 2 'bots at a time. It says right on the rules that anyone using multiple RCX's should build in fault tolerance ;p For those of us who can do it all with 1 RCX, we're not too worried ;) Whatever the group decides... I (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

22 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR