Subject:
|
Re: Project X and game play
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 00:39:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
496 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Derek Raycraft writes:
> Chris Magno wrote:
>
> > The original game plan was to set up all the robots in a line and have
> > all the robots run at the same time. • [...]
> > IT was pointed out to me that if we run all the robots at once the bot
> > owners would really not get a chance to watch other robots work.
>
> Yes, I definitely want to be able to watch other peoples robots. To me this
> is far more interesting then running my own robot.
>
> > I would like to propose that as a solution we run one bot at a time and
> > time the robot.
>
> I like this plan, although there can be a problem with accurately timing the
> robots.
>
> Paired contest would also be ok. Winning could be based on finishing before
> the other guy, that way you don't have to worry about an accurate timer.
> Then you could do the round robin playoff kind of thing.
I prefer having them all run at once. I think that if we run the robots
often enough, everyone will get a chance to see all the robots doing their
thing. I don't think I've ever seen a competition where this is done. It'd
be wild to see a dozen (or however many) robots all whizzing away at once!
Do you think we'd cause a brownout in the library?!? :-)
I suggest that someone come up with twenty starting configurations, as a
start. After the official competition is held, there's still plenty of time
to go around looking in minute detail at how each one does it's thing.
--
David Schilling
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Project X and game play
|
| (...) no...considering that half the 'bots don't use the RCX 1.0 (with the AC adapter). (...) That, and it would allow the "stragglers" to see the robots in action. And I would have a pretty "easy" day. The problem with that is possible IR (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: Project X and game play
|
| "David Schilling" <davidNO@SPAMsunteleia.com> wrote in message news:GpnB65.51M@lugnet.com... (...) time (...) Wait, 20 starting configurations? Do you mean random patterns? I thought we decided we were having one pattern that would be run throughout (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Project X and game play
|
| (...) It also makes it tricky for people that build more then one robot. I was originally going to do this, however with my current time constraints it doesn't look like this going to happen. (...) Yes, I definitely want to be able to watch other (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
