Subject:
|
Re: Project X and game play
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 02:02:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
510 times
|
| |
|
|
"David Schilling" <davidNO@SPAMsunteleia.com> wrote in message
news:GpnB65.51M@lugnet.com...
> I suggest that someone come up with twenty starting configurations, as a
> start. After the official competition is held, there's still plenty of • time
> to go around looking in minute detail at how each one does it's thing.
Wait, 20 starting configurations? Do you mean random patterns?
I thought we decided we were having one pattern that would be run throughout
the day, generated once randomly in the morning?
Iain
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Project X and game play
|
| (...) The way that is currently stated on the page is: -A set of Starting Patterns is chosen somehow (submissions in a hat, random, whatever). -Each round, everyone runs the same Starting Pattern. ie, if the first Starting Pattern of the day is a O, (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: Project X and game play
|
| (...) OOPS. Iain, I thought it was understood that for every "round" it would be a new and different pattern. it would be boring to watch the same robot do solve the same pattern over and over again. Besides, any logic program you come up with to (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Project X and game play
|
| (...) I prefer having them all run at once. I think that if we run the robots often enough, everyone will get a chance to see all the robots doing their thing. I don't think I've ever seen a competition where this is done. It'd be wild to see a (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
