Subject:
|
Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:51:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
505 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Eric Joslin writes:
> I was under the (incorrect?) assumption that the lugnet server performed the
> lookup for the new domain as part of the jump.cgi process.
It doesn't, no.
--Todd
> If it is, in fact, your machine doing the lookup, then no, Lugnet traces
> wouldn't be needed, natch.
>
> eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
| (...) I was under the (incorrect?) assumption that the lugnet server performed the lookup for the new domain as part of the jump.cgi process. If it is, in fact, your machine doing the lookup, then no, Lugnet traces wouldn't be needed, natch. eric (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
