Subject:
|
Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
352 times
|
| |
|
|
PS, can you spot the transatlantic jump? it's pretty easy to see...
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Larry Pieniazek writes:
for bricksmiths:
> 11 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms SO-1-0-0.TR1.LND2.Alter.Net [146.188.7.230]
> 12 80 ms 90 ms 90 ms SO-6-0-0.IR1.DCA4.Alter.Net [146.188.8.169]
for lugnet:
> 11 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms SO-1-0-0.TR1.LND2.Alter.Net [146.188.7.230]
> 12 90 ms 91 ms 80 ms SO-6-0-0.IR1.DCA4.Alter.Net [146.188.8.169]
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
| (...) I, at this client in the UK at a time when no one else is in the office and the connection SHOULD be lightly loaded (it's all new hardware here but we go somewhere else before it goes public) don't get quite the same results Mike does... same (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
