Subject:
|
Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Nov 2000 05:23:45 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@antispamMATTDM.ORG
|
Viewed:
|
474 times
|
| |
|
|
Christopher Lindsey <lindsey@nospam.mallorn.com> wrote:
> I'm a little confused about the caching issue. Are we talking about DNS
> caching, or some sort of in-between proxy cache? Or is it the browser cache?
> Initially I thought that we were talking about DNS lookups taking the most
> time...
It's these guys: <http://www.akamai.com/>. They've secretly taken over most
of the internet.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
| (...) I'm a little confused about the caching issue. Are we talking about DNS caching, or some sort of in-between proxy cache? Or is it the browser cache? Initially I thought that we were talking about DNS lookups taking the most time... If the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
