Geeking : 2455


Off-Topic / Geek / 2455	2454 \| 2456

Subject:	Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date:	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 20:41:04 GMT
Viewed:	544 times

In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Dan Boger writes: > why do you need traces from lugnet to wherever? the jump.cgi doesn't get > the data for you, it just redirects you to your desination... so the > connection speed between lugnet and your target is immaterial. I was under the (incorrect?) assumption that the lugnet server performed the lookup for the new domain as part of the jump.cgi process. If it is, in fact, your machine doing the lookup, then no, Lugnet traces wouldn't be needed, natch. eric

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
(...) D'oh, what the heck am I talking about. No, you're right, Lugnet searches aren't necessary at all, either way. It's been a long time since I've done any DNS stuff, just ignore me on that point. eric (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

		Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
(...) It doesn't, no. --Todd (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
(...) why do you need traces from lugnet to wherever? the jump.cgi doesn't get the data for you, it just redirects you to your desination... so the connection speed between lugnet and your target is immaterial. btw, if you want to try another host, (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

36 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search