To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 8371
8370  |  8372
Subject: 
Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 24 Nov 2000 06:49:07 GMT
Viewed: 
303 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
Recently, though, I am seeing that the delay introduced is going up,
significantly. In fact, so much delay is being added, that on this brand new
750 Mhz P3 384m Windows 2000 system (where I haven't tweaked any of the time
parameters)... on this fairly fast system, when I am dialed in, about 1/2
the time IE times out. I have to then manually strip off the jump stuff to
actually get to the URL.

Hence the subject... is it just me? Is anyone else seeing this? Has it
gotten slower over time? Can it be sped up at all? Can it be turned off? I'd
complain less if I had access to the stats, I guess, because I'm curious
about usage and stuff. But I hate paying performance penalties, and this is
a problem where throwing more sand at it (this machine is 50% faster than my
old one) didn't help.

It isn't just you.  I notice the delay as well on every machine I use - fast
or slow, on every connection I use, fast or slow.

Last time I looked into this (and I think posted about it) it seemed fairly
obvious the biggest delays were had by IE users.  I recall the delay being
minimal when using Nutscrape.  That doesn't help me (or the overwhelming
majority of the browsing public) though, because I'm not about to switch to
Navigator or Mozilla or whatever its called this year just to read LUGNET posts.

I don't care if its IE's fault, or this script's fault, or anyone else's
fault - the delay is real and it is incredibly annoying.  That's why,
whenever I remember, I always copy the shortcut, paste it into another
browser window, and strip off the jump.cgi crap.  Even though that takes a
few seconds it is ALWAYS faster than if I just right-click and tell it to
open in a new window.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
 
(...) It seems that slow DNS is the culprit if Todd is right. Why does cutting and pasting make it go faster? If Todd is right, you would have to pay the same DNS price either way. Or is it just a perceived speedup? Well, I've set FUT o-t.geek to (...) (24 years ago, 25-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:
  "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
 
As preface, for those that don't know what the LUGNET jump.cgi does... It is a way to track stats on who goes where. For example, when I type (URL) into a post, the web interface rendering technology shows the URL in different text color/font and (...) (24 years ago, 23-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

36 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR