Subject:
|
Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 20:43:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
543 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Dan Boger writes:
>
> > why do you need traces from lugnet to wherever? the jump.cgi doesn't get
> > the data for you, it just redirects you to your desination... so the
> > connection speed between lugnet and your target is immaterial.
>
> I was under the (incorrect?) assumption that the lugnet server performed the
> lookup for the new domain as part of the jump.cgi process.
D'oh, what the heck am I talking about. No, you're right, Lugnet searches
aren't necessary at all, either way. It's been a long time since I've done any
DNS stuff, just ignore me on that point.
eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
| (...) I was under the (incorrect?) assumption that the lugnet server performed the lookup for the new domain as part of the jump.cgi process. If it is, in fact, your machine doing the lookup, then no, Lugnet traces wouldn't be needed, natch. eric (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
