Subject:
|
Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Nov 2000 22:21:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
298 times
|
| |
|
|
Is it possible there's any firewall issues? I know at work I regularly
see situations where it takes ages for a page to come up, during which
time, I can't do anything else in Netscape because the whole thing is
locked up (it won't even re-paint windows). This is Netscape 3.01 on
AIX. I've suspected this to be an issue of how DNS works with the
firewall, but it could also be a problem with TCP session establishment
(and remember that jump.cgi does also impose an extra TCP session on the
process). This extreme delay comes and goes (but definitely is worst
around 9:00 AM and around lunchtime (which I'm assuming are browsing
peaks).
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "jump.cgi" considered harmful ? (1)
|
| (...) Well, not quite...I'm not ready to posit a cause-effect chain. I was merely trying to say that I couldn't fathom how the script itself could add anything more than a small fraction of a second. Slow DNS is one possible answer, but if it (...) (24 years ago, 25-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
