To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 2849
2848  |  2850
Subject: 
Re: Mc Donald's Lego
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Thu, 9 Sep 1999 16:01:35 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@uswest{StopSpam}.net
Viewed: 
1276 times
  
Sproaticus wrote:

> James Brown wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > Sproaticus wrote:
> > > > Now, Burger King's (relatively) new fries -- now that's a god-awful snack if
> > > > I've ever tasted one.  Cruel and unusual nourishment.
> > > What I find pathetic/amusing there is that BK claims that their fries
> > > win taste tests! How could that be possible? Where did they find the
> > Did the specify what they were testing against?  I'd probably give BK fries an
> > edge over most leading motor oils.
> 
> You give BK's fries too much credit.

Yeah, I'd say they taste worse than the motor oils who finished last, too;-)

> 
> 
> Cheers,
>  - jsproat
> 
> --
> Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Mc Donald's Lego
 
(...) You give BK's fries too much credit. Cheers, - jsproat (27 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

42 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR