Subject:
|
Re: Mc Donald's Lego
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Sep 1999 15:18:23 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
{jsproat@}spamless{io.com}
|
Viewed:
|
652 times
|
| |
|
|
James Brown wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > Sproaticus wrote:
> > > Now, Burger King's (relatively) new fries -- now that's a god-awful snack if
> > > I've ever tasted one. Cruel and unusual nourishment.
> > What I find pathetic/amusing there is that BK claims that their fries
> > win taste tests! How could that be possible? Where did they find the
> Did the specify what they were testing against? I'd probably give BK fries an
> edge over most leading motor oils.
You give BK's fries too much credit.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Mc Donald's Lego
|
| (...) Did the specify what they were testing against? I'd probably give BK fries an edge over most leading motor oils. James (URL) (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
