Subject:
|
Re: Mc Donald's Lego
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Sep 1999 02:53:20 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LPIENIAZEK@NOVERA.COMspamless
|
Viewed:
|
340 times
|
| |
|
|
Sproaticus wrote:
> Now, Burger King's (relatively) new fries -- now that's a god-awful snack if
> I've ever tasted one. Cruel and unusual nourishment.
What I find pathetic/amusing there is that BK claims that their fries
win taste tests! How could that be possible? Where did they find the
testees??? we have to make sure the monsters don't reproduce!
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Mc Donald's Lego
|
| (...) I suspect that they force-fed the new fries to Mr. Potato Head until he surrendered and gave positive results. I know I would last only a few minutes. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | Re: Mc Donald's Lego
|
| (...) Did the specify what they were testing against? I'd probably give BK fries an edge over most leading motor oils. James (URL) (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Mc Donald's Lego
|
| (...) Good thing you didn't say they were better than Wendy's's, or I'd have to take you to .debate... :-, Now, Burger King's (relatively) new fries -- now that's a god-awful snack if I've ever tasted one. Cruel and unusual nourishment. Cheers, - (...) (25 years ago, 8-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
