Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 4961 – 4980 of about 12000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) That, I suppose, is the problem with the argument that those who deserve will get medical care through charity. You have too much faith in humanity. Jasper (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) No kidding? Man, you're weird. (...) And? Nothing wroing with ad hominem attacks, if you can support them properly with your arguments. If they can't, it's just more ammunition to use against them. Win/win situation, really.. Jasper (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
(...) The point I was trying to make with John, and seems to be pushed to the wayside, is that mayhaps the church, and doctroines thereof, need to be revisited--whether you personally accomodate homosexuals in your life is nice and all, but (...) (21 years ago, 14-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
(...) The intolerance I was refering to is that of those who take issue with religions or religionists for their beliefs, basically telling someone that they must unconditionally accept your chosen lifestyle. One of my best friends has recently (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Pagans and Xtians (was Re: Sex Scandal etc)
(...) I'm pretty sure it has a lot do with the prohibition concerning idolatry via the decorating of trees in Jeremiah: ---...--- 10:1 Hear ye the word which the LORD speaketh unto you, O house of Israel: 10:2 Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
(...) Here is what I do not understand, the church is not "forcing" them to do anything, this guy was problably born into the Catholic church, but since young adulthood he has had the choice to remain or not. What I truely don't understand is why he (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes: (snip) (...) Easter, not scriptural? I do remember being in Religion classes back in school and be told that it was the most important Christian celebration! (...) I dunno that much about the old (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
(...) Absolutely! Let's get out the rocks! Don't worry about hte men who commit the 'adultry' with them, for men shouldn't be held responsible for their transgressions. And women should be seen and not heard! And don't touch the skin of a pig, or (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
(...) And why is that? Why should the "church" tell two people, who want to live in the institution of marriage, that they can't just because those two folks are of the same sex? Where in the teachings of Jesus does it say, "Marriage is good for (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
(...) You may be right. It amounts to something like this: I don't judge others by my own possibly limited notion of what is right and wrong for me as being right and wrong for them; unless they are dragging me down with them, then my hand is forced (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
(...) Here's where you have to consider what things mean and weigh your estimate of people's intelligence and character. Do you think Hilary Clinton is an idiot that didn't know her husband had a long string of affairs with other women? Or is it (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
(...) I think you'd have a hard time demonstrating that's actually true. After all, the best "brainwashing" is one in which the victim thinks there was no undue influence whatever. (...) I suspect there are no such people anywhere on the earth, (...) (22 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: THIS is why this whole war is a waste of time. - NO ITS NOT - GO BUILD SOME LEGO!!
(...) Not what I meant at all. All I meant was that having these discussions will have very little impact since people are dumb and will often follow the best leader (which I didn't mention). Now, the smart people are not necessarily going to change (...) (22 years ago, 11-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
(...) From the beginning? Do you suppose she would have married him in the first place knowing that he would cheat on her in the future? I doubt it. (...) That may be so, but we are discussing in the context of marriage, and a Christian marriage at (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Having it both ways W.R.T. DPRK
The agreed framework ((URL) was a bad idea when the Clinton administration put it forth, and it continued to be a bad idea all along. How bad an idea indeed, we know now, since the DPRK was apparently violating it all along. But under the terms of (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
(...) Well, thank you, Lar, in the name of all Québécois, all BL shop owners, etc etc, to not judge them because you don't agree with me. Although this time, I do agree with your moral choice not to force religion onto your children. That was very (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Look, Ma -- No Arms, No Legs...!
“Frustrated, U.S. Arms Team to Leave Iraq: Task Force Unable To Find Any Weapons” (URL) -- The group directing all known U.S. search efforts for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is winding down operations without finding proof that President (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: One more reason why I'm refusing to shop in Wal*Mart
(...) Well, if it isn't coercion, I'd like it defined. How is this different from a gang-like group walking into "Mom-n-Pop Hair Salon" and telling them "Pay up or you'll start losing money?" Well, that's a little extreme and called extortion, so (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		Re: O, Tradition!
(...) By all accounts, Atlanta doesn't really suffer from that kind of thinking, but I suppose it answers the question when people ask why there are still "black colleges" (Morehouse is in Atlanta). -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 3-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

		The Choke Hold, The Fear
"Bush Statement on Judges Demonstrates Orwellian Doublespeak: Despite 13-Year Low in Vacancies, Bush Claims Judicial Crisis" (URL) by signaling that he will work with the Senate Republican leadership to change Senate rules that have worked well for (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.282)

More: Next Page >>