Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 1 – 20 of about 12000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Ture Capitalism and Property Rights (was Re: People are idiots...)
(...) Could you explain what you mean by 'all rights are property rights'? (...) Why? (Is it purely so capitalism will work?) (...) No respect for rights = socialism Respect for rights = capitalism ? No. If all rights are property rights then: (...) (21 years ago, 8-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.124)

		Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?
(...) I think a word is missing. How about: "all rights are necessarily property rights" and "some rights aren't necessarily property rights"? (...) I think before I can do that, I need you to explain what a property right is. Where does this (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.097)

		Re: Pure Capitalism and Property Rights (was Re: People are idiots...)
(...) Lots of interesting stuff there. Plenty of examples demonstrating that specific rights can be construed as property rights, but apparently nothing demonstrating it to be the case for all rights (but I could have missed it - there are, after (...) (21 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.083)

		Re: Plowed Ground
(URL) Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:G3s0ut.62v@lugnet.com... (...) it (...) was (...) but (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.082)

		Intolerance and property rights
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <38C99133.A47A4F64@v...er.net>... (...) I'm a bit curious as to how patents fit into this scheme. One the one hand, it is clearly good to protect the investment that went into an invention (both "dollars" and the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.081)

		Plowed Ground
(...) Speaking of which, you've mentioned previously that "all rights are property rights" or something to that effect. I won't ask you to rehash it all for me, but do you recall approximately when or in what context that was first discussed here? (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.078)

		Re: Ture Capitalism and Property Rights (was Re: People are idiots...)
(...) Sure... (URL) 118 (1998) is the first place I think I use that phrase in this forum. (21 years ago, 8-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.075)

		Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?
(...) OK, fair enough. Just to be clear, if we posit that there are no property rights, under such a system of rights calculus, it might well be OK for you to walk up to me and rip food out of my hand, food that I traded someone else for, or grew (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.068)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) <snip> Far better to simply declare that all rights are property rights and assign a dollar value for all transgressions, eh Larry? Cheers Richie Dulin (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.064)

		Re: People are idiots...
(...) True capitalism is more than just supply and demand, it requires recognition of property rights. Selling stuff that you stole is just thuggery or fencing, not capitalism. (...) All rights are property rights. What is right is to respect them. (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.063)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
(...) <snipped derivation of 'all rights are property rights'> Larry, bookmark that post - you'll need it again. ;-) James (URL) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.062)

		Re: Which of the Ten Commandments are Libertarian? (was: Re: Mormon bashing again)
(...) You only need 1... this one: 8 - Thou shall not steal. All the rest that make sense derive from it. (left hanging and unproved in a previous thread is the assertion that "all rights are property rights" and "no initiation of force" and "people (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.059)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
(...) Actually, that was a derivation _from_ all rights are property rights. Very big difference. Jasper (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.059)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) Apparently so. (...) It seems like a good idea, it seems like it might work. Because all rights are property rights and all that... Okay, so I accidentally kill my neighbour. Darn it, I say. I must make recompense for the killing. Do I (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.057)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) I see. Well... Taking on Larry's sentence some while ago, if all rights are property rights, can't you reduce common law to law against theft, and then extend it to all conflicts of interests where one party gets harmed? (I'm not saying it is (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.056)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) Why would sarcasm be a reason not to take a comment seriously? (...) But it's okay simply declare that all rights are property rights and assign a dollar value for all transgressions, just because a capitalist government* happens to get into (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.051)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) Ahh... so we can dispense with the beaurocracy do determine the price of the crime and build a judiciary instead. Seems like a good idea. But what is this mention of a criminal penalty? How does that fit with an 'all rights are property (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.050)

		Altruism is a bad idea? (was Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind!)
(...) And here I was thinking that "all rights are property rights" was a strange belief. Adieu Richie Dulin (2 URLs) Port Brique Somewhere in the South Pacifique (2 URLs) Misérable Building a safer South Pacifique (21 years ago, 13-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.050)

		("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?
This is the anchor of a new thread to deal with the subject proposition. Posters to this thread will have accepted the first parenthetized equality as true, and will have accepted that humans are life affirming, and that therefore to initiate the (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.048)

		Re: Don Quixote puts away his lance (was Re: McDonalds set
(...) Neither more nor less, because they are not actually different things. Right to life and right to property are the same thing. ALL rights are property rights in my schema. The "right to life" as I see it is my right to dispose of my life as I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 6.046)

More: Next Page >>