Subject:
|
Re: Family values?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 01:25:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
325 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Steve Thomas writes:
> guess that you hold to what I would call a "consent-only" ethic: that is, if
> two people consent to a sexual relationship - whatever that entails - then
> it is perfectly appropriate/moral/justified. Do you agree? Any exceptions?
Mostly. You may also have contractually obligated yourself to other
limitations of behavior. If I agree with my wife that we won't sleep around,
then violating that agreement is bad.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Family values?
|
| "Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:G6t0JK.3Jw@lugnet.com... (...) or (...) Weeks (...) thread), (...) If (...) Chris, Before we begin, could I ask you to be a little more explicit as to your position as regards sexual (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
