Subject:
|
Re: Family values?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 17:57:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
282 times
|
| |
|
|
> I believe that there is a compelling case to be made as to the intrinsic or
> necessary wrong of sex outside of marriage. Perhaps I'll invite Mr. Weeks
> to think through one or two arguments with me (in another post or thread),
> if he's interested. ;-)
I've been waiting to see the new thread. Did I need to respond to get it? If
so, then shoot. (Bad choice of words given the other thread :-)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Family values?
|
| "Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:G6t0JK.3Jw@lugnet.com... (...) or (...) Weeks (...) thread), (...) If (...) Chris, I just saw your note and will try to post something tomorrow. Take care, Steve (23 years ago, 8-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Family values?
|
| "Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:G6t0JK.3Jw@lugnet.com... (...) or (...) Weeks (...) thread), (...) If (...) Chris, Before we begin, could I ask you to be a little more explicit as to your position as regards sexual (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Family values?
|
| (...) Bill, I agree with you that sex outside of marriage is immoral, but I want to make a distinction as to its primary wrongfulness. It is not - as I understand the problem - primarily wrong because of any contingent circumstances that may or may (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
