Subject:
|
Re: Family values?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 13:01:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
444 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Maggie Cambron writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> > So the only one that isn't a victim is the non-biological father forced to pay
> > child support?
> >
> > That's the largest pile of bovine dung I've ever heard!
>
> No, I agree he's a victim too. If anyone is not a victim in all this it would
> be the mother, who should have informed both of her partners of the possibility
> that either of them could be the father at the very beginning.
I don't usually do this, but... Yeah! What she said. I certainly never meant
to imply that the false-father wasn't a vicitim. He's the worst one.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Family values?
|
| (...) No, I agree he's a victim too. If anyone is not a victim in all this it would be the mother, who should have informed both of her partners of the possibility that either of them could be the father at the very beginning. Maggie C. (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|